Hi all,
Would anyone have objections if I renamed VCL's graph.hxx and graph.cxx to
graphic.hxx and graph.cxx respectively?
I find the artificial shortening of names a bit odd and disconcerting, and
in the case of graph.hxx it sort of implies the header deals with *graphs*,
as opposed to the Graphic class (i.e. images).
I did a bug fix around JPEG exports not picking up the DPI last night, and
would be happy to back port this fix if there is a concern it might
interfere with this. Heck, I'd be happy to back port any fixes a rename
might cause issues with - I would really like improve code readability,
which I guess is an itch I need to scratch.
Thanks in advance,
Chris
Context
- Rename of include/Vcl/graph.hxx and graph.cxx · Chris Sherlock
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.