On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:35:16PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:28:53PM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
1;2802;0c>
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:49 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote:
commit 87199d3829257420429057336283c55be6ae7481
Author: Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@collabora.com>
Date: Tue Nov 24 16:59:29 2015 +0000
vcl: re-introduce idle handling.
which fixed the problem on master/5-1. Its non-trivial to backport that
though to 5-0. Not sure how that should look if applied to 5-0
Right; it's ~impossible to back-port without some seriously
heavy-lifting / re-qualification process - I'm amused/interested to hear
that it fixed something ;-) I'd not support it going into -5-0 really.
I'd suggest that it'd be better to work out what two (or more) events
are getting mis-ordered to cause the issue in the bug - and get stack
traces from those code-points in both 5.0 and 5.1 - and I'd be happy to
take a look; perhaps in-person at FOSDEM.
You are saying that this commit is not in 5-1?
My "git log" says it is in 5-1.
--
Lionel
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.