Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch

Joel Madero <jmadero.dev -AT- gmail.com>
Mon, 14 Dec 2015 06:37:36 -0800



On 12/14/2015 06:13 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:

Do you think you can take a look at it "fast" or should we revert?


I don't remember why/how I was involved with this? Did I say I would
test it and somehow it fell through the list of things that I have to
do? What should I "look at"? Was it my commit? Is there something I can
do to fix it? I'm happy to test in a couple hours but need a bit more
guidance.


Best,
Joel

Context

help request on proposed VCL code patch · Lionel Elie Mamane
- Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Caolán McNamara
  - Base QA request · Lionel Elie Mamane
    - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Base QA request · Joel Madero
  - Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Lionel Elie Mamane
    - Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Joel Madero
      - Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Lionel Elie Mamane
        
        Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Joel Madero
        
        Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Lionel Elie Mamane
        
        Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Alexander Thurgood
        Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Lionel Elie Mamane
    - Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Caolán McNamara
      - Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch · Lionel Elie Mamane

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.