https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96348
Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sbergman@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #0)
Don't submit such a change unless you have tested that the code still builds,
...and passes "make check", as some DLLPUBLICs might only be there for test
code to be able to access otherwise internal entities. (In which case those
uses of DLLPUBLIC should arguably be commented accordingly.)
Also, note that there is different behaviour between GCC (as typically used on
Linux) and Clang (as typically used on Mac OS X, but also on Linux) whether to
treat non-exported RTTI of types with identical identifiers as identical. This
can e.g. have consequences for uses of dynamic_cast, and can be relevant e.g.
when a class in vcl/inc/ has erroneously been marked VCL_DLLPUBLIC instead of
VCL_PLUGIN_PUBLIC.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Bug 96348] Get rid of unnecessary DLLPUBLIC decorations in module-internal include files · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.