Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
wrote:

On 11/23/2015 11:14 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote:

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com
<mailto:sbergman@redhat.com>> wrote:
 >
 > On 11/23/2015 11:02 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote:
 >>
 >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Stephan Bergmann
<sbergman@redhat.com <mailto:sbergman@redhat.com>
 >> <mailto:sbergman@redhat.com <mailto:sbergman@redhat.com>>> wrote:
 >>  >
 >>  > On 11/23/2015 10:42 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote:
 >>  >>
 >>  >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Stephan Bergmann
 >> <sbergman@redhat.com <mailto:sbergman@redhat.com>
<mailto:sbergman@redhat.com <mailto:sbergman@redhat.com>>
 >>  >>  > The Clang included in Fedora 23 is known to be broken,
 >>  >> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282645#c3> "Clang
fails to
 >>  >> link boost library."
 >>  >>
 >>  >> Instead of using the pre-build binaries/packages of Fedora, I
build from
 >>  >> source. Of course, that doesnt mean it couldnt still be broken
;-)
 >>  >
 >>  >
 >>  > See my recipe in the "By the way" paragraph in the bug I linked.
 >>
 >> Thanks. So that works around the clang bug, only to uncover a bug in
the
 >> Fedora 23 GNU libstdc++ ? Looks like Im screwed.
 >
 >
 > Note that the libstdc++ issue is in debug-mode--only code, so LO is
only affected (and the little additional patch I presented to fix things
up only needed) with --enable-dbgutil.
 >
Ah. And, perhaps, affected with '--enable-debug' ? Im using that. So
just omitting '--enable-debug' should make the clang build succeed ? Or
am I (once again) missing the point here ?


No, not affected by --enable-debug.

And the 'add the patch <http://reviews.llvm.org/D12834?id=34645> "add gcc
abi_tag support'" part of the recipe is required independent of LO
--enable-dbgutil, only the "plus a little patch..." part can presumably be
ignored in the (implicit) --disable-dbgutil case.

(There may also be other ways how to make Clang on Fedora 23 work, like
overriding libstdc++'s _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI setting, but I haven't
explored that.)


Alright, thanks for all the help and explanations/clarifications. It's
appreciated. But I guess ill wait until that patch trickles down to at
least the latest llvm/clang svn version though, so I can just get away with
something like 'svn update && make && sudo make install' for llvm/clang.

Or try doing something like 'make CXXFLAGS=-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0' /
'CXXFLAGS=-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 ./autogen.sh' or even 'export
CXXFLAGS=-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 && scan-build --use-cc=clang
--use-c++=clang++ ./autogen.sh' for the libreoffice build like you
mentioned.


Or just try another distro altogether.
;-)

Thanks again,


- Maarten.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.