Re: Performance issues with our internal memory allocator

Hey,

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2015-09-28 11:11 AM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> >
> > So it seems that the system allocator is actually even worse as can be
> > seen at
> > http://perf.libreoffice.org/perf_html/suite_cppu_sc.html
> >
> >
> > I'll leave it in for a bit as I want to see what happens if we increase
> > the memory for the vm but I fear that the
> > numbers show that the internal allocator is actually useful.
> Probably best would be to walk up the stack a little and see if you can
> get the code that calls the allocator to reduce the number of times it
> needs to do so.
> I always find that it way more useful (and more fun) than fiddling with
> custom allocators :-)
I'm not sure if I understand your comment. Can you please clarify what you
mean with that? Maybe my understanding of our memory allocators is bad but
I see not how this comment applies to the discussion.

Regards,
Markus