Re: Enum types in IDL and in code

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>
Fri, 7 Aug 2015 11:53:48 +0200

On 08/07/2015 11:32 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:

In case all other ParaAdjust implementations (I'm sure at least editeng
has one) also deal with a sal_Int16 in fact, then just changing
'[property] com::sun::star::style::ParagraphAdjust ParaAdjust;' to
'[property] short ParaAdjust;' in the IDL file (and using a comment to
still refer to the enumeration informally) would make sense, I think.
Even if the in-build check complains that this is nominally an
incompatible change.

or, even more conservatively, keep the property declaration of typeParagraphAdjust (to avoid becoming---if only nominally---incompatible)and just adapt the documentation and state that actual implementationsuse values of type SHORT instead

Context

Enum types in IDL and in code · Matthew J. Francis
- Re: Enum types in IDL and in code · Stephan Bergmann
  - Re: Enum types in IDL and in code · Matthew J. Francis
    - Re: Enum types in IDL and in code · Noel Grandin
    - Re: Enum types in IDL and in code · Miklos Vajna
      - Re: Enum types in IDL and in code · Matthew J. Francis
        
        Re: Enum types in IDL and in code · Miklos Vajna
        
        Re: Enum types in IDL and in code · Stephan Bergmann
        
        Re: Enum types in IDL and in code · Matthew J. Francis

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.