On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:37:34PM +0800, Matthew J. Francis wrote:
On 18/06/2015 22:23, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Nope, branch point is not good. Given that a recompile takes hours,
I'm rather unlikely to pursue this in detail. I started a "git
bisect", let's see if I have enough patience to get to the end.
Note that if you have an automated reproducer - a failing test which
gives a nice obvious exit code is perfect - you can drive your
bisect automatically with "git bisect run"
It might not make it any faster, but at least you can ignore it and
get on with something else
(The argument it takes is a script which should exit with code:
0 == good
125 == skip (build failure)
anything else == bad
so in this case it should suffice to first build without tests, exit 125 on
failure, then run the tests and exit with whatever the result of that was)
Sounds like our "bin/" directory should contain a script that takes
the test name and does that :)
--
Lioel
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.