Hi Adolfo,
Am 01.06.2015 um 07:37 schrieb Adolfo Jayme Barrientos:
2015-05-31 20:03 GMT-05:00 Dennis Roczek <dennisroczek@gmail.com>:
-- mainly to 3.6 (so no urgent I guess).
… which leads me to a question: why do we keep help content for
unsupported releases in the wiki?
Why not? Some users have to use (parallel) LibO 3.6 because the
StarOffice file format was dropped in LO4. Just for an example.
I suggest that we drop any content corresponding to any release older
that 4.4, and maintain only those pages corresponding to the Fresh and
Still branches at a time.
At the moment we do have ~900k Pages - including redirects for all
versions (3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 - so for 9 versions).
Redirects are very cheap. (don't cost server resources)
Images are defacto not existent (not many, all small).
And 900k pages are not very much for Mediawiki. Moreover as Robinson
already said that there are some companies providing long term support
for old versions.
Adolfo
Regards,
Dennis Roczek
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.