Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> wrote:
On 03.06.2015 11:42, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Hi,

Is there any simple, boilerplate way in bugzilla for reporters to tell
whether the observed behavior of LibO 5 on 64-bit Windows is actually
about x86 or x86-64 version (or both)?
Current combination of fields "Version"/"Hardware"/"OS" does not suffice
for the purpose.

the "Hardware" field can be used for this purpose.
...
but like many things in bugzilla, this is not obvious because the naming
is awful...

is it possible to rename the "Hardware" field to something better in our
bugzilla installation?

Got a suggestion?

The tootip for the 'Hardware' field does say "The hardware platform
the bug was observed on." I'm not sure how many people are matching
that field to their chipset, their OS, or their build of LibreOffice,
but at least personally I do use the field for my actual hardware
(setting the field only when relevant). In general, the detail of
word-size is a minor distinction within all our bugs.

Cheers,
--R

-- 
Robinson Tryon
QA Engineer - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
qubit@libreoffice.org
802-379-9482 | IRC: colonelqubit on Freenode

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.