On 2015-06-01 09:33 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 04:47:56PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> wrote:
I fixed the underlying bug, but I would like to fix the test so that
it fails when one of the threads fails. I tried to not catch the
Exception, but that does not help. (I noticed the thread failure by
looking at workdir/JunitTest/dbaccess_complex/done.log )
Can't you call org.junit.Assert.fail() in the catch block?
That's what the current code is doing, but org.junit.Assert.fail() just throws an AssertionError, so doing that inside a
child thread is not useful.
The better way is to use ExecutorService, Callable, and Future.get(), see here for an example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6546193/how-to-catch-an-exception-from-a-thread
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.