Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi All,

It's time to try moving away from "MAB" list and towards using
priorities correctly. That being said:

1) "Highest" reflects that it's equivalent to a MAB;

2) Highest can be matched with any severity (minor, normal, major,
critical, blocker) but should be dictated by common sense logic:
*# of users affected;
*regression
*fully triaged (with bibisect, crash log, etc...)
*obviously major, critical, blocker make it to the list faster than
minor/normal issues

Guide:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg

On the test bugzilla server we now have priority/severity locked -
hopefully this gets moved to the actual instance of bugzilla in the
coming weeks - it still needs tested thoroughly (see previous email)

Worst case if this fails, we can always move "highest" to a new MAB
tracker but I'm really hoping this is unnecessary.


Best,
Joel

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.