Hi All,
It's time to try moving away from "MAB" list and towards using
priorities correctly. That being said:
1) "Highest" reflects that it's equivalent to a MAB;
2) Highest can be matched with any severity (minor, normal, major,
critical, blocker) but should be dictated by common sense logic:
*# of users affected;
*regression
*fully triaged (with bibisect, crash log, etc...)
*obviously major, critical, blocker make it to the list faster than
minor/normal issues
Guide:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg
On the test bugzilla server we now have priority/severity locked -
hopefully this gets moved to the actual instance of bugzilla in the
coming weeks - it still needs tested thoroughly (see previous email)
Worst case if this fails, we can always move "highest" to a new MAB
tracker but I'm really hoping this is unnecessary.
Best,
Joel
Context
- Goodbye MAB - Hello "Highest" · Joel Madero
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.