Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

On 03/06/2015 12:11 AM, Alex Thurgood wrote:
> Le 06/03/2015 05:52, Joel Madero a écrit :
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> > I'm curious if anyone has any thoughts about bugs that have backtraces
> > but QA has been unable to repro. Should these just be pushed to NEW ?
> >
> > Currently there are 8 UNCONFIRMED crashers  - at least one or two of
> > those have backtraces but have had other members of QA say they cannot
> > reproduce.
> Got a link for those issues handy ?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=525899&regetlastlist=525899

There are the 8 crashers currently reported and unconfirmed. At least 2
of them have backtraces - one of the other ones has some kind of a
system dump or something...

If we can just mark as NEW then I suggest we start automatically asking
users to do a backtrace (at least suggest and link to the wiki). Might
save a few rounds of NEEDINFO -> UNCONFIRMED -> NEEDINFO -> WFM ->
UNCONFIRMED ;)

Best,
Joel


> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/