However, I had to commit a handful of somewhat fishy changes to make that work, all revolving around bad downcasts of class pointers. Most of them are in the context of destroying an object of derived class D, having reached the destructor of base class B (so "this" no longer points to a D, only to a B), but then the destructor of B calling out to some code that invalidly downcasts from B to D. What is most fishy about those cases is whether it makes sense at all to do any substantial computation from a destructor (which parts of our code base are infamous for, though).
Therefore, I would appreciate it if others could take a look at those commits (all the commit messages contain backtrace excerpts):
* vcl:** <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=6449e5bb6dd1f09678e09164ef21f455132af98f> "Hack to make an in-destruction SystemWindow no longer claim to be one"
* sc:** <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a015f2c125ebeff895984ff99267918932df529d> "Hack to work around an in-destruction ScStyleSheetPool no longer being one"
* sw:** <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5a934b2c6085d4e397e1466f8cd6a813f3c2d9d6> "Hack to make an in-destruction SwFlyFrm no longer claim to be one"
** <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e49ca69747e9e905dbb00bbd5a7ea85331607a04> "Hack to make an in-destruction SwFlyInCntFrm no longer claim to be one"
** <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=db2c0dc78f11c2764f16e7ca4edaf2cdffc56c64> "Hack to make an in-destruction SwPageFrm no longer claim to be one"
** <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=dedc93e973b59ca4d1660fc3820770bf9b072896> "Hack to work around an in-destruction SwTxtNode no longer being one"
** <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0f98299f7aa44bbb55c1bfeddca7799f727d14b0> "Avoid bad downcast of SwFrmFmt to SwSectionFmt" (where the SwFrmFmt appears to be a genuine SwFrmFmt instance, not an in-destruction SwSectionFmt one?)