Hi Stuart, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:46:29PM -0700, V Stuart Foote <VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu> wrote:
Request for late review for 4.4.1 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c7e907f58f8d0791ee304b42de769f43102522e9 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ad14ed0bbf80dd95dca6e0dea6edbe5fb68f9f26 The first corrects 4.4 MAB tdf#88935 and has been picked up in 4.4 for the 4.4.2 branch, the later further improves image drawing frame refresh handling of image cache. Believe both to be worthwhile late pushes for the 4.4.1 cycle.
This is not how things work. :-) If you want to see a commit backported to 4-4-1, then please build 4-4-1 yourself, cherry-pick the commit, build-test it, then test that the commit on 4-4-1 indeed fixes the problem (otherwise there is no point in backporting it), and if so, push to gerrit. Once it's on gerrit, it'll get reviewed as usual, and at the end either rejected or submitted to the release branch. The point is that who wants to have something on a branch does the work of backporting (which may or may not be trivial depending on how much conflicts you get), not the reviewers, who are already the bottleneck. Thanks, Miklos
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature