Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Stanislav Horáček
<stanislav.horacek@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I've created a help patch containing examples for DBCS functions as
suggested by Jesper Hertel on the l10n mailing list [1]. In Gerrit review, I
was advised to state his authorship [2], however I was not replied how to do
it.

Should Jesper send his licence statement to this list and should I change
commiter's name to his name?
Or in general - how to deal with authorship of patches that are created as a
result of some collaboration, e.g. in mailing list or bugzilla?

Yes a License statement from Jesper would be greatly appreciated... to
make things air-tight.
No it is no mandatory for Jesper to make the patch himself... it is
perfectly fine for you to have taken care of that...(*)
giving credit properly in the commit message in that case is fine.

Norbert

(*) the ability to write good documentation is a distinct skill set
than the ability to turn that in the specific dialect of xml used by
the help system, and distinct from the fluency with git and gerrit.
so it is perfectly fine to join force

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.