Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 18.12.2014 11:55, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Hey,

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com
<mailto:bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com>> wrote:

    Hi,

    On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:19:08AM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
    > -     // that sounds like a stupid idea
    > +     // actually this is really cool for small changes
    >
    >       Also - we have various solutions to allow central compilation coming -
    > right.
    >
    >       ;-)

    Yes, inline editing is an important and cool thing. If our workflow
    cant handle
    that, we need to adapt it (e.g. more, earlier CI and unittests) not
    the other
    way around. ;)


It is not that easy. This feature shifts some of the work from the
developer to the reviewer. IMHO our reviewers are already one of the
weakest link in our development process as reviewing is normally only
done by the people who have been working on the code for a long time and
know the code quite well.

I'd like to see solutions that shift work from these people and make it
easier for new reviewers to come in and not make their job more complex
and more demanding.

i disagree with your assessment of the feature.  it will make things
easier for reviewers,  because if you spot a trivial typo in a patch you
can just quickly fix it, you don't have to decide between downloading
the patch and editing it offline and pushing it manually, or adding a
comment and then waiting for the submitter to upload a new version of
the patch and get 4 email notifications about it and review it again.



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.