I wonder if it is politically controversial to be seen as "supporting" a
markup language, though, the antithesis to WYSIWYG... Even if it is a quite
new and minimal markup language, that doesn't pretend to be even close to
full-featured (like troff or TeX).
I can imagine the reaction among the trolling population, "oh, so
LibreOffice developers don't like their own software, but prefer to write
their documentation in this sixties-style markup language, ha ha ha".
But yeah, one should ignore trolls. I actually like the idea quite much.
--tml
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.