Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 09/11/14 09:26, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Whether OpenCL is useful, or even available, on a machine or not, and
whether OpenCL-related code is compiled, are separate things. We check
OpenCL availability at run-time, and even when available, the intent is
that we check whether the implementation possibly is known to not be
good enough, at run-time.

(But sure, yeah, we also have the --enable-opencl configure-time switch,
and I guess that suggesting to get rid of it would be seen by "users" as
a REGRESSION!!1!.)

You mean users like me? Okay, I don't have a clue what OpenCL is, but
like most gentoo-ers I try and optimise programs for my system. If I
knew my system didn't have it, I would rather it wasn't there... :-)

Cheers,
Wol

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.