On 09/11/14 09:26, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Whether OpenCL is useful, or even available, on a machine or not, and
whether OpenCL-related code is compiled, are separate things. We check
OpenCL availability at run-time, and even when available, the intent is
that we check whether the implementation possibly is known to not be
good enough, at run-time.
(But sure, yeah, we also have the --enable-opencl configure-time switch,
and I guess that suggesting to get rid of it would be seen by "users" as
a REGRESSION!!1!.)
You mean users like me? Okay, I don't have a clue what OpenCL is, but
like most gentoo-ers I try and optimise programs for my system. If I
knew my system didn't have it, I would rather it wasn't there... :-)
Cheers,
Wol
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.