Hi, Rene Engelhard schrieb am 12.10.2014, 19:40 +0200:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote:It's supposed to pick it up automatically.get debugging information if Libreoffice didn't pick up the extension for some reason?What does unopkg list --bundled (or validate --bundled) say. Does it appear$ unopkg list --bundled All deployed bundled extensions: <none>And validate --bundled? If also not, it probably isn't seen at all...
No, nothing.
Searching the web, I was not able to find information about which files are relevant for this recognition process at all, only about how to invoke unopkg with an OXT extension.Yeah, because this is supposed to be only used for "bundled" extensions.
Hence the word :).
Does it have a proper description.xml? (And or META-INF/manifest.xml)? But when that isn't present a unopkg add .oxt shouldn't have worked either. Does that work?
It turns out that it doesn't.
$ unopg add -v *.oxt
ERROR: unsatisfied dependencies
Cause: (com.sun.star.deployment.DependencyException) { { Message = "unsatisfied
dependencies", Context = (com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @91ec368 }, UnsatisfiedDependencies =
([]com.sun.star.xml.dom.XElement) { @91f7c8c } }
unopkg failed.
I've attached the description.xml, which you probably already have seen. Is it
because it depends on OO instead of LO?
Thanks
Sebastian
--
Web: http://www.crustulus.de | Blog: http://www.crustulus.de/cgi-bin/blog.cgi?de-0
Freies Latein-Deutsch-Wörterbuch: http://www.crustulus.de/freedict.de.html
FreeDict: Free multilingual dictionary databases - http://www.freedict.org
Attachment:
description.xml
Description: XML document
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature