Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 10/09/2014 10:04 AM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:

On Oct 9, 2014 6:53 PM, "Stephan Bergmann" <sbergman@redhat.com
<mailto:sbergman@redhat.com>> wrote:
 >
 > On 10/08/2014 09:53 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
 >>
 >> I *think* the assert is correct and the RTF tokenizer has to be
 >> adjusted, but first I wanted to see how much does
 >> e1cbaebe7fe36690e192778c87b5eb63790017d7 help. In any case, it's good to
 >> see that this time the jump is around 5 documents and not 1000. :)
 >
 >
 > Just curious, and as those "Crash test update" mails with their
obscure .csv attachments are white noise to me---how do you read from
that data that there was a jump of 5 in bad documents, for example?

They list the number of documents that crashed. Each row is for one
crash test run. So if the number in the same column increases it means
that more documents crashed. Now there are files for import, export and
the third one for validation errors. Eike already asked to add the date
of the test run into the first column but I had not enough time yet to
implement that.

Ah, so the number of lines in e.g. exportCrashes.csv indeed appears to increase by one for each "Crash test update" mail.

So I would have expected that all lines expect one (either the first or the last, whichever way they are sorted chronologically) would remain the same from one "Crash test update" mail to the next. But no, that is not the case, so I apparently still did not get what those numbers mean.

Stephan


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.