Hi,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 07:35:30AM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
BTW, nobody has to work hard to change my mind. If you or anybody else
objects to what I did, just go ahead and revert, and pursuade another
able developer to vote for it. That's all that's required.
I totally believe Kohei works on this -- and elsewhere -- with the best
intentions, so I see little point in the aggression against the change here.
OTOH the prospect of people doing wikipedia-style edit-wars on gerrit with
changes and reverts at some point isnt too appealing either. So a sober
discussion of this on the ESC to close the topic, while still sucking, isnt too
bad an idea at this point IMHO.
OTOH a _much_ better point for this discussion would had been when the original
patch was still on review. The tricky part is to have more visiblity on that
without drowning everyone in noise. If anyone has some good code or tooling to
help create better visibility, I guess that would be appreciated[1].
Best,
Bjoern
[1] E.g. someone volunteering to tweak the daily gerrit digest to:
- work on release branches
- do a weekly? digest
- sorted by the source code module (so some could watch Writer, some Calc, etc.)
Could allow QA/supporter guys to have more early visibility of what is
happening. Then again, this would need people to actually _read_ that
regularly. If anyone volunteers to invest (both in writing/setting up the
tooling and creating a group using it) here, it might be worth a few experiments.
Context
Re: ESC call Thursday 16:00 central European time ... · Kohei Yoshida
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.