Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote
Julien, I am curious if you have done any testing.
...
Hi Andrew,
First thank you for your feedback.
I must recognize that no, I didn't made any tests.
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote
No differences were found in this little test. Then again, on Fedora,
Boost may be configured to use the built-in implementation, I don't
really know. I did not check our source code, but, it might reduce the
LO code complexity a little bit, that might be a gain.
Ok, let's wait for a building expert about this.
Julien
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Should-we-use-boost-math-log1p-expm1-instead-of-rtl-math-log1p-expm1-tp4122334p4122614.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.