https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79123
--- Comment #5 from Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com> ---
"No even then. The recommended way to do a working patch is using drafts:"
I disagree with that.. quoting yourself from a wiki page does not make a
'recommended' way.
Draft are a pain in the but... and when you wrote that it was not even possible
to view other's draft for most people
So the feature exist.. but is by no mean 'recommended'.
"there is little harm done, when the change is abandoned under the conditions
above. Reviving a abandoned change is trivial and the autoabandon is actually a
helpful reminder -- better than letting them stay in limbo for months."
Patch are presented typically from the newsest modified to the oldest modified.
furthermore reviewed -2 patch are visually easy to detect
so ... such patch do not actually interfere with normal reviewer works
I do not see the ground to put the burden of 'little harm' to fellow committers
by messing with their work just to make the main page 'look good'
I'm not arguing against the clean-up of drive by patch not being worked upon..
but a patch uploaded by a committer, explicitly marked -2 by him should be left
alone.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Bug 79123] Autoabandon gerrit changes with negative feedback and more than 1 month without action · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.