Hi Kohei,
I have a good deal of respect for your opinion, I've tried my best to keep
the commit history :-)
Thanks all for the responses!
Chris
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Kohei Yoshida
<kohei.yoshida@collabora.com>wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 18:56 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 00:22 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
My only request is that the move be done in such a way that git knows
the files have been moved (in a single commit), rather than the old
files removed and new one added.
That is, for all intents and purposes, not going to work here, when
methods are mixed and matched differently.
Oh, I thought he was just relocating the methods. Maybe I
mis-understood what he's doing.
FWIW, from my own experience, I've done a fair amount of large scale
reorganization in the past, and even if "methods are mixed and matched
differently", with careful commit strategy you can stil maintain lineage
of commit history. So, I wouldn't dismiss it right from the start.
Anyway, ultimately it's all up to Chris since (as Norbert said) he's the
one making this all happen. Mine was nothing more than just a humble
request.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.