https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53472
--- Comment #13 from Roberto <rgnodev@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Hi everybody, I was planning to put hands on this issue as my first time
hacking L.O..
I would like to ask some questions on which general directions it may be
better to take:
- Reading past discussion, it seems to me that there is some agreement on
the fact that dynamically-sized integrals/sums/products/etc. should be given
as a command additional to "int" & C.. In other words, dynamic size should
be optional. Is that correct?
- There seems to be some work done by Véghelyi András in the past (see
previous commments in this issue). That code may possibly be a good starting
point.
I'm not familiar at all with Gerrit and the rest of the patch/merge workflow
in L.O., but is this code available anywhere? Was it integrated at the time
in L.O.? Or, how could I check such a thing?
Comments of any kind are very appreciated.
Thanks,
Matteo
Dear Mateo:
About your first point, my humble opinion is that dynamic size should be
optional (some people think that different instances of the same operator,
belonging to the same line, should not have different sizes; despite of the
size of their operands. Check
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=45511 for details).
I have no information about your questions in your second point.
Kind regards.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Bug 53472] FORMATTING: Integral Symbols too small for some integrands · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.