https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #58 from Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #57)
I understand your point of view, and probably it's the best idea. It's wrong
to put sal_uLong definition in sal/types.h?
Yes, that's wrong. sal_uLong is a "temporary" hack for a problem in code
"above" the URE interface, so it should not find its way into the URE stable
interface.
Looks like there is a handful things (SVLIBRARY. sal_uLong) that best stay in
tools/solar.h for now, even if that means that tools/solar.h cannot be removed
completely for now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Bug 63154] replace tools/solar.h macros with osl versions · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.