Hey,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Anthonys Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
wrote:
On 10/02/2014 13:32, Ruslan Kabatsayev wrote:
I'd like to note that there're still lots of video cards which are not
even 2.0 capable - e.g. intel video in my EEE PC 1015PN only supports
OpenGL 1.4 with ARB assembly shaders. Another example would be
(although quite old, but still working and actively supported by intel
in Mesa) i915G chipset, which has similar characteristics.
Also, if you try using Mesa 9.1+ with these, you'll get (exactly, not
higher than) OpenGL 2.1 advertised, but really giving you software
fallbacks every now and then.
So, I'd not like to have an office suite require OpenGL higher than
1.4 (it may use higher versions if they are available, but still not
require).
I'll add that I have literally just retired my old No 2 workstation which
had a Matrox Millenium or similar graphics card - and have also re-purposed
a Matrox G440. I don't know what OpenGL these are, but the hardware is all
Y2K era, and still working fine. I suspect that's older than i915 (the
processors are Socket A).
I'm sorry but there is no chance that I will support OpenGL 1.x with this
feature. Even if there is still hardware out there it amkes no sense to work
with a standard that is so old that it has been deprecated by Khronos
several years ago. We will simply not support this feature on such hardware.
Luckily glew allows us to make this a runtime check so it will just not be
available.
It is a bit more complicated with OpenGL 2.x and 3.x as they are much
closer. As it seems most people already have support for 3.x on Linux +
everyone on Windows and modern Macs. In general every recommendation is to
avoid using the compatibility context and use the new core context that was
introduced with 3.0. Targeting OpenGl 1.x with the fixed pipeline is just
stupid while writing new code.
In general we are making the OpenGL stuff right now runtime optional by
using glew while it was compile time optional before. In general I'm one of
the persons who is more in favor of dropping support for older versions but
I had some discussions with other developers who disagree. We will see how
this plays out.
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.