Re: LO, scan coverity 708945 (non virtual destructor in parent class)

Julien Nabet <serval2412 -AT- yahoo.fr>

Sun, 08 Dec 2013 00:19:05 +0100

On 08/12/2013 00:04, Arnaud Versini wrote:

Hi

No specific destructor doesn't means no code generated, as we can see,two OUString could be leaked by not executing SfxListUndoActiondestructor. Also an issue for me.

Of course some code is generated but I meant with no delete instruction

or something, just an empty method. (Hope I got it right when I read

about this ! :-) )

Julien

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.