https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65108
--- Comment #14 from Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #13)
A conforming compiler is also allowed to support only 16-bit integers
No.
I don't really see the point in bringing up
theoretical restrictions that no real-life compiler that our code would get
near to has.
This is not about bringing up theoretical restrictions. If we do such a huge
cosmetic clean-up like this, and there's two ways to do it, and one is
standards conforming ("...") while the other is not (<...>): Then if there is
no good reason to deviate from the standard, it only looks natural to me not to
do so.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Bug 65108] Clean-up header includes (global/local) · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.