On 11/10/13 09:00, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Because we (intend to) have platforms where we need a
"stripped down" LibreOffice
I used to think so too (and still do). But now I think that should be
handled during packaging, not during building. That puts the burden on
the packagers of such stripped-down versions, where it should be,
instead of making it possible to *build* (and fail building) LO in
hundreds of different ways, which puts the birder on the source code
maintainers.
no, the problem is that there are independent conditionals determining
whether something should be built, and whether the same thing should be
packaged. there should be only one conditional to guard both building
and packaging.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.