Re: How are installation sets being built?

On 10/10/2013 04:12 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 10/10/13 09:14, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > ....which brings me back to my original question for a universal trigger
> > whether or not to produce installation sets during a build.
> >
> > Seeing that --enable-epm currently effectively fulfills that role
> > everywhere but on Windows, one option would be to make it fulfill that
> > role on Windows too.  (I have a local patch to do that.)
> >
> > The alternative would be to introduce an explicit
> > --enable-installation-sets.  Opinions, anyone?
>
> we already have --with-package-format, much simpler to do nothing if the
> user doesn't specify that than adding another option, or using
> --enable-epm on a plaform where EPM is irrelevant.

Yes, sounds better to tweak --with-package-format into that role than to 
stretch --enable-epm.

So, if there are no complaints coming, I'll change the meaning of 
--with-package-format so that only if --with-package-format=... is 
explicitly specified are installation sets (of the specified kinds) 
generated.

Stephan