Hi,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 05:50:05PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 06:16:16PM +0400, Ivan Timofeev <timofeev.i.s@gmail.com> wrote:
Quoting the report:
"It compiles successfully on 4.7.0 with -std=c++98".
So, should we add this flag for libcmis?
Hmm, but we bundle boost 1.54. What's the point of using system boost,
but internal libcmis? Wouldn't it make more sense to tweak the tinderbox
to not mix system and internal libraries?
In general, using system libs might incur high amounts of redtape for
LibreOffice:
- using the external lib might incur bugs/regressions that are not encountered
with the internal version and requires extra testing or bugfixing
- the external lib must be packaged in a recent enough version
- even a packaged version might need additional review and process to be usable
by LibreOffice, e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess
as such, having the option to fall back on a internal copy is highly desirable.
Best,
Bjoern
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.