[SOLVED] Re: About erasing iterators (ohierarchyholder.cxx, package module)

julien2412 <serval2412 -AT- yahoo.fr>
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 03:57:15 -0700 (PDT)

Jan Holesovsky wrote

...
If I am not mistaken, unordered_map is a _Hashtable, with end() defined
as const_iterator(nullptr), so it is constant, and your change was
actually fine.  Then again, I am no C++ expert, so probably better to be
safe, and just check against m_aChildren.end() ;-) - you don't save much
anyway, .end() is cheap.


Already done (see my previous comment) then:-)

Thank you for your help Jan.

Julien



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/About-erasing-iterators-ohierarchyholder-cxx-package-module-tp4071746p4072012.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Context

About erasing iterators (ohierarchyholder.cxx, package module) · julien2412
- Re: About erasing iterators (ohierarchyholder.cxx, package module) · Jan Holesovsky
  - Re: About erasing iterators (ohierarchyholder.cxx, package module) · Julien Nabet
    - Re: About erasing iterators (ohierarchyholder.cxx, package module) · Jan Holesovsky
      - [SOLVED] Re: About erasing iterators (ohierarchyholder.cxx, package module) · julien2412

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.