Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hello Jonathan,

For now I've only tested it against iOS5.0 and later so I don't think it's
compatible with iOS4.1. The app is pretty much based on storyBoard which is
one of the main features of iOS5, so sadly iOS4 will not be compatible :'-(

Siqi


2013/7/15 Jonathan Aquilina <eagles051387@gmail.com>

What is the oldest version of iOS this will work with as i have an older
ipod touch with 4.1 on it.


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Siqi Liu <me@siqi.fr> wrote:

Hello Jonathan, Tor and all LibO developers and QA testers,

I've just integrated TestFlight into the app and now I need to register
beta-testers' iOS devices in order to distribute this beta-testing version
to you.

For that I've created a gdoc to gather unique identifiers from all beta
testers which is available here:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1XXpZWnPoIZEsyVG9Q-9TuvinjvjtuzeirEFY0WwRrJA/edit?usp=sharing

Please, feel free to register your iOS devices as testing devices so that
I can register your devices for the ad-hoc distribution. You will then get
a copy of the beta-testing distribution (.ipa) and try out this new app on
your devices :-D This app gets better because of you!

Happy testing and poke me for all questions you may have. Please also let
me know if there is any mailing list that might be more appropriate for
this matter.

Thank you!
Siqi



2013/7/14 Jonathan Aquilina <eagles051387@gmail.com>

For app testing there is a website that allows testing of ios apps
called test flight.

https://testflightapp.com/


On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi> wrote:

The progress is really impressive!


Also, should I publish this version on the app store so that people
don't have to compile it? Or export it to an ipa file?

I don't think it is a good idea to publish it before it is ready for
real use; one is not supposed to publish "beta test" versions in the App
Store.

I would assume any hint at it being a test version in its description
or in the app itself will automatically mean it won't get approved into the
store.

And on the other hand, if you publish it, knowing it has still
problems, but without being able to tell so to customers, that will just
generate bad press for it, "LibreOffice published their Impress Remote for
iOS but it doesn't work".

Better to use the ad-hoc distribution mechanism, I think, where if I
understand correctly you specifically add provisioning to the app to run on
up to 100 named tester devices, and then distribute the app to these
testers.

--tml

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




--
Jonathan Aquilina




--
--------

Cordialement,
Siqi LIU

Étudiant Ingérieur, Université de Technologie de Compiègne
Vice-Président de l'association robotique UTCoupe
Responsable d'atelier de ClubChine

------
  Tel. +33 7 61 16 95 83
  email: me@siqi.fr
------




--
Jonathan Aquilina




-- 
--------

Cordialement,
Siqi LIU

Étudiant Ingérieur, Université de Technologie de Compiègne
Vice-Président de l'association robotique UTCoupe
Responsable d'atelier de ClubChine

------
  Tel. +33 7 61 16 95 83
  email: me@siqi.fr
------

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.