Re: [Libreoffice-commits] help.git: "Error: Duplicated entry. ID = par_id3154286 LANG = en-US"

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:34:08AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> FYI, I "fixed" that for now by bumping one of the duplicates to
> par_id3154287, but have zero insight into where those IDs are used,
> and what a proper fix would look like.

Thanks for the fix. Coaching I got on IRC said that these IDs have no
meaning per se, they just need to be unique within each file.

The question now is why I did not get that error when test-building
myself...

> On 04/23/2013 08:37 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> >  source/text/shared/02/01170102.xhp |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > New commits:
> > commit 2057fbeeeab78144913ded4b662d14db7e64f8ff
> > Author: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
> > Date:   Tue Apr 23 08:33:12 2013 +0200
> >
> >     Error: Duplicated entry. ID = par_id3154286  LANG = en-US
> >
> >     in File .../helpcontent2/source/text/shared/02/01170102.xhp.  Introduced with
> >     e54918ea208076c28dd2b2879f2aee3f280f81b3 "document new value -1 for BoundColumn
> >     property of ListBox."  No idea if this is a proper fix, though.
> >
> >     Change-Id: I6f6ce7ab425b3120b0794f622ac9111a6ad8f025
> >
> > diff --git a/source/text/shared/02/01170102.xhp b/source/text/shared/02/01170102.xhp
> > index afe1d04..6e6bdcf 100644
> > --- a/source/text/shared/02/01170102.xhp
> > +++ b/source/text/shared/02/01170102.xhp
> > @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
> >  </tablerow>
> >  <tablerow>
> >  <tablecell>
> > -<paragraph role="code" id="par_id3154286" xml-lang="en-US" l10n="CHG" 
> > oldref="42">-1<comment>since LibreOffice 4.1</comment></paragraph>
> > +<paragraph role="code" id="par_id3154287" xml-lang="en-US" l10n="CHG" 
> > oldref="42">-1<comment>since LibreOffice 4.1</comment></paragraph>
> >  </tablecell>
> >  <tablecell>
> >  <paragraph role="tablecontent" id="par_id3145757" xml-lang="en-US" l10n="U" oldref="43">The 
> > index of the selected entry in the list is linked to the field specified under <emph>Data 
> > field</emph>.</paragraph>