Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
As for IDEs: Actually I dont think that many Python stuff is done in
a IDE -- most is simply written in an editor.
I think you are wrong, at least when we're talking about the classic
3rd party mostly-closed-classic-development-shop.
It seems to be a real market -
http://wiki.python.org/moin/IntegratedDevelopmentEnvironments
There is no dominant IDE (much less so a crossplatform one) and there seems to
be a lot flux on which IDE is the en vouge one each year. Thus aiming to have
simple, stable and robust build environment that is generic and independant is
key -- whatever is the IDE du jour should be able to integrate that easily.
Instead of caring about a zoo of IDEs or enterprisy deployment
tools, what is needed is:
a/ well maintained examples
b/ some tutorials and youtube vidoes showing how simple it is
False dichotomy - you'd want to appeal both to the casual hacker that
wants the quick solution, _and_ the enterprise...
The second follows the first, not the other way around. Thus aim for the first
to get the second.
Best,
Bjoern
Context
Re: Removing C++ SDK examples, clearly encouraging Python extensions · Stephan Bergmann
Re: Removing C++ SDK examples, clearly encouraging Python extensions (was: LibreOffice prints on tuesdays) · Thorsten Behrens
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.