On 29/03/13 16:18, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Thursday 28 of March 2013, Noel Power wrote:
I have reverted this commit, as it fails on at least two 4-0
tinderboxes (Clang and Win-x86_6). I also couldn't find anything like
this in master.there
there is a good reason why there isn't something like this on master,
the code around this area has changed and this patch isn't doesn't work
as expected with the changed code
Please check the commit.
well it would be *really* useful to have the logs associated with the
unit-test failure, then at least I could judge whether the patch really
needs reverting or it is the unit test needs to be 'tweaked' a little.
Naturally the test passes here for me
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.