On 25/03/13 10:16, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 11:19 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Wouldn’t it also be beneficial for developers as well in the sense
that the build and compile only what they need as well as for build
bots too?
Build bots should IMO build what's being delivered (e.g. documentation, 
tests, etc) to ensure they still work as a minimum.
        Perhaps - avoiding the compile-time unit tests also speeds things up
for developers - but it's not something we recommend or advertise :-)
Generally, with the Tracker project (which is dwarfed by LibreOffice in 
terms of size naturally, but which has many functional and unit tests) 
we don't enable these by default and only the core developers tend to 
enable them to make sure we catch the problems before releases. This 
should be eased further if you have buildbot/farms/etc. For people 
generally trying to build and use the project from source, you could 
argue it's more of a hindrance than a benefit.
--
Regards,
Martyn
Founder and CEO of Lanedo GmbH.
Context
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.