Time Begin: 1405
Present: Florian, Joel, Joren, Petr, Robinson
Pending Action Items
*NEEDINFO
+AGREED: Current text is good for 1st comment to be added to all
NEEDINFO bugs which have not had activity for 6+ months.
+AGREED: This week we will start process
+ACTION: Joel will be responsible for mass bug changes this round,
he will do test with ~20 bugs to make sure system works, then move
forward with the rest of them
-Will email developer list to let developers know the data/time
that change will occur
-AGREED: Temporary whiteboard status to monitor bugs that are
mass commented on
*Bug Submission Assistant (Localized French)
+Update from Rob is that most technical work is done, some minor
translation is ongoing from Sophie
*Realistic Goals
+New wiki page discussed in “NEW ACTION ITEMS”
+https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA_Projects
*Funding Wishlist
+Need update from Bjoern about status of netbooks
-If netbooks are approved: ACTION: Joel will write up proposal
for how we go about determining if someone is eligible to get one
*Triage Contest
+AGREED: Timeline looks good, plan to do contest June 20th – July 5th
+Any notes about rules can be sent to Joel via email
+ACTION: Joel will work on rough draft of rules over the next few
weeks
+Ideas for prizes
-Hoodies, T-Shirts, Mug, laptop case
*Wiki Pages
+Joren has merged and cleaned QA-Team page
- https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/QA_Team
New Action Items
*FDO
+Prioritized Bugs
-AGREE: Somehow being able to determine what bugs have been
prioritized by QA is a good thing
-A lot of discussion about using QA field or new whiteboard
status – pros and cons discussed
-Lead to discussion about what QA contact means, some
disagreement and acknowledging pros/cons of different ideas
-AGREED: Move conversation back to mailing list to try to find
best solution, aim to have final vote next meeting.
-ACTION: Joel will start thread back up from Rainer's previous
thread.
+Verified – WORKSFORME
-AGREED: Makes a lot of sense to have this, original reporter
can confirm that a bug indeed WFM by setting status to VERIFIED –
WORKSFORME
-AGREED: If QA member sets bug to WFM they should leave a
comment explaining that if reporter can verify to change status, if they
cannot, to reopen as UNCONFIRMED
+Signature
-Using signature could be good if it invites users to
contribute to LibreOffice through multiple avenues such as QA,
marketing, developing, and explains that run by a team of volunteers.
Also a pointer to good bug reporting (reproducible steps, good
prioritizing)
*Wiki
+New wiki page to track QA projects
- https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA_Projects
-Everyone welcometo add projects, idea is that if someone
leaves QA, their projects will continue for others to work on
+Team Page
- https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/QA_Team
-Everyone who wishes to be included in “QA Team” should add
name to this list
End Time: 1510
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.