Hi Caolan,
Confirmed that libX11 x86_64 is installed, but you are right about exotic
option.
I used headless because I had issues without it.
Please ignore the original issue (#1) and please help me with issue (#2)
when I do not give headless to autogen.sh
./autogen.sh --prefix=/work/opt/libreoffice-4.0 --without-junit
--enable-debug --without-java
I get following error :
checking for GSTREAMER_0_10... configure: error: Package requirements
(gstreamer-0.10 gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10 ) were not met:
No package 'gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10' found
I have gstreamer-plugins-base installed :
rpm -qa |grep gstreamer-plugins-base
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.29-1.el6.x86_64
#3 Would you be able to give me some pointers on how the make is structured.
I can now see desktop/Executable_oospash.mk has -lX11 but not sure how
the path is followed to get to that line. I tried make -d but it doesn't
show the trace.
only : [build LNK] Executable/oosplash
thanks
Neeraj
Hmm, the makefile is desktop/Executable_oosplashx.mk and it already has
a -lX11 in it.
So..., I suppose.
a) you definitely have libX11-devel.x86_64 installed (and not just
libX11-devel.i386) ?
b) you didn't add any exotic configure options like --enable-headless to
your configure line (seeing as -lX11 is inside a ifndef headless
section.
C.
--
=====
Intuition - is the inability to figure out the facts on which we based the
decision.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.