Re: [Libreoffice-commits] core.git: desktop/source

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:54 AM, julien2412 <serval2412@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Yes I meant it, why? Is it wrong?
> if "pReceiveBuffer" is initialized with 0 for the (sc_nCSASeqLength + 1)
> elements thanks to = {0} initialization, what obvious thing did I miss? Why
> "pReceiveBuffer[nBytes-1] = 0;" would need to stay?

Ok since I added that particular code,  let me explain

> -            if (nBytes > 0)
> -            {
> -                pReceiveBuffer[nBytes-1] = 0;
> -            }

was needed because the loop before can exit under 2 conditions:
the normal one where  a[nBytes - 1] is already 0
or the 'non-normal' one when the recv return 0 (or -1 for that matter)
which mean the pipe got interrupted prematurely, in which case the
buffer would _not_ be 0-terminated
which was relyied upon later.

there is also the case where recv bail out before reading anything at
that point nByte = 0 si of course we do not want to do a[nByte - 1]
and for that case a[0] is set to 0;

initializing the whole buffer is a waste in all case but the corner
case where the pipe get broken.

Note: it is clearly not expected that the pipe close with receiving
a\0 as last character... ortherwise we would already be segfaulting a
lot due to the code aftert that that _assume_ that the buffer is a
0-terminated string.
so there is no particular danger that a valid character would be
overwritten in normal expected cases.

Norbert