Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:21:22PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
  "[...] given OOo/LO's tradition of being installable to arbitrary
locations (which in turn is a direct consequence of its
multi-plaform
nature), there's code available in OOo/LO's SDK that can be bundled
with [...] applications [that programmatically spawn an OOo
process to get their work done] to help them to find a OOo/LO
installation, with fallbacks to platform-specific heuristics.  For
Unix, that includes searching PATH for a file or symlink named
'soffice'.  Not breaking that has been one reason why it has never
been considered worthwhile to drop the /usr/bin/soffice symlink
'just for aesthetics.'"

That reminds me of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695916 and
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121481...

Regards,

Rene

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.