So I agree with Kohei, we should not modify this if we do not have very
good reasons with really promising prospects for benefit. Of course, if
someone has ideas here, we should discuss that (may be better on qa list?).
+1, let's take this off developer list and come up with a good solution
from QA team.
Apologies for moving too quickly on this and bringing it right to dev list.
Rainer, I'll start the conversation on QA list shortly, it might move to
the next call but I think there is room for improvement here.
Best Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero.dev@gmail.com
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.