Re: [PUSHED] Documentation for sfx2

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>

Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:45:37 +0100

On 01/09/2013 11:14 AM, Miklos Vajna (via Code Review) wrote:

Thank you for your patch!  It has been merged to LibreOffice.

If you are interested in details, please visit

     https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1599

Approvals:
   Miklos Vajna: Verified; Looks good to me, approved

Do people generally consider it a good idea to include binary

documentation files (rather than some helpful ASCII art in the existing

*/README files, say) in the core repo? I personally consider it not

very practical.

Stephan

Context

[PATCH] Documentation for sfx2 · Lennard Wasserthal (via Code Review)

[PUSHED] Documentation for sfx2 · Miklos Vajna (via Code Review)
- Re: [PUSHED] Documentation for sfx2 · Stephan Bergmann
  - Re: [PUSHED] Documentation for sfx2 · Miklos Vajna

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.