On 02/01/13 10:11, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
C++11 has a specific syntax to achieve mostly the same effect more
cleanly:
OXMLCell& operator =(const OXMLCell&) = delete;
That's slightly better since it tells the compiler that this class
should have *no* assignment operator. So any code that tries to use it
will have an error message "no such operator".
The "private + unimplemented" trick tells the compiler the operator
exists, but only the class itself is allowed to use it.
another alternative is to derive the class from boost::noncopyable,
which has the same effect without endorsing yet another bizarre
overloading [sic] of keywords by the C++ designers...
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.