Michael Meeks <michael.meeks <at> suse.com> writes:
Hi Donald,
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 00:09 +0000, Donald Murray wrote:
Caolán McNamara <caolanm@...> writes:
As with anything, someone needs to actually do it. There are gadzillions
of requests for implementation of things, so if you're in a position to
have a stab at it, then that's the thing to try and do. Even a partial
starter implementation is likely sufficient to get the ball rolling on
any particular topic.
Caolan has the perfect take
Outlining is the most commonly quoted reason for people not giving up using
... < snip extensive promotion of the need for this feature > ...
This is the developers list. It is used by developers to discuss
development: creating and fixing code, patch review and all sorts of
developery stuff.
It is not a suitable forum for people to post feature wish-lists. If it
was we would be deluged in non-actionable and de-motivating E-mail from
users: all of whom are missing some feature, and/or have some
suggestion that in turn would drive away the very developers we are
seeking to mentor, encourage & assist.
If you wish to be involved in implementing something in this area -
"even a partial starter implementation" (as Caolan says) - then people
on the list are more than happy to invest their time to help get you
productive. If that is your intention, you're much more than welcome
here - otherwise, please continue the discussion on the discuss list.
Thanks,
Michael.
<Flame off>
I can understand both sides of the problem here, I have seen many blogs from
journalists who support Linux but say that it will never become mainstream until
the developers give the users what the users want regardless whether the
developers like what the users want or not.
The current situation is like going to a pub who have a Trad Jazz band on,
playing what they like, not what the customers want to hear and The Jazz band
getting upset when all the customers leave.
We all know that Microsoft's Operating systems still haven't attained what Linux
had years ago, so why do we (Linux users) have to put up with the reverse
situation with applications?
It is like you developers being forced into developing without using snippets or
syntax checkers, just because Mr Gates has them. Bill uses them so we won't,
just to spite him. Rearrange this to make a meaningful sentence:
Spite cutting off face to nose your your.
The danger here is that I and others would be prepared to pay a reasonable
amount for the features in Libreoffice that we want.
We all know that is the start of a slippery slope. So, here is the deal, you
give us what we want and we will let you use: vi spell nroff troff LatEx awk sed
and the pipe character for your word processing.
Just a thought
<Flame on>
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.