Hello,
In sal/osl/unx/security.c, I noticed these:
278 sal_Bool SAL_CALL osl_getHomeDir(oslSecurity Security, rtl_uString
**pustrDirectory)
279 {
280 sal_Bool bRet=sal_False;
281 sal_Char pszDirectory[PATH_MAX];
282
283 pszDirectory[0] = '\0';
373 sal_Bool SAL_CALL osl_getConfigDir(oslSecurity Security, rtl_uString
**pustrDirectory)
374 {
375 sal_Bool bRet = sal_False;
376 sal_Char pszDirectory[PATH_MAX];
377
378 pszDirectory[0] = '\0';
I'm not sure but I think it doesn't put the rest of the array to 0.
Would memsetting to 0 the whole array be right (and possibly useful)?
What about this too ?
sal_Char pszDirectory[PATH_MAX] = "";
It compiles but I wonder if it would be ok for every env
Julien
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Using-memset-or-other-way-in-sal-osl-unx-security-c-tp4026020.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Context
- Using memset or other way in sal/osl/unx/security.c · julien2412
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.