On 12/12/2012 02:06 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I never used it, never quite got the point of it... but clearly some
other people found it useful...
I used it, and so did Kohei - as a means to create cheap local
clones. There were a few glitches though all the time, e.g. Cloph a
few times complained about tinderbox breakages b/c of spurious tree
changes.
Not following the thread fully I'm not sure what this is about. I'm
guessing this is about git-new-workdir vs submodules.
To put it short, I got it to work, and so far I haven't seen any major
issues but some occasional oddities which I just dismiss for now.
I would personally not invest the time to properly fix it these days,
disks are cheapish and we don't have this load of different repos
anymore.
To me git-new-workdir is not about diskspace, but about avoiding the
hassle of managing multiple local repos. Keeping it in one local repo
make it easier to manage especially when I tend to cherry-pick between
branches quite a lot.
But let's not discuss on this as I'm sure that will lead us nowhere (as
git-new-workdir is something either you get and appreciate, or not at all).
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.