Re: Efficient string concatenation

On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry fro previous post. mishap...

> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz> wrote:
> >  Hello,
> >
> >  The work is based on threads [1] and [2] and occassionally seeing in the
> > commits that people doing string cleanups sometimes change ugly code to only
> > slightly less ugly code. With the new feature enabled, any string
> > concatenation/creation is simply done as (well, ok, the number() part is not
> > done yet, but shouldn't be difficult to add):
> >
> > OUString s = foo + bar + "baz" + OUString::number( many ) + "whatever";
> >
> > All the other alternatives, like explicit OUStringBuffer and repeated append()
> > should be now worse in all possible aspects.

What is the recommended way to deal with
for(xxxx)
{
      sString += foo;
}

OUStringBuffer is still the way to go in that case right ?

Norbert